<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Definition of Philosophy &#187; Internet Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/category/internet-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does Higher Education Make Any Difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/internet-philosophy/does_higher_education_make_any_difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/internet-philosophy/does_higher_education_make_any_difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutes and Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[career]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We see a lot of people taking up higher studies. Normally these are the additional vocational degrees or the professional schools we know as Masters degrees. While not all people can have the time or afford to get into them, being adjudged a certified MBA degree holder logically holds a brighter future for anyone. Or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We see a lot of people taking up higher studies. Normally these are the additional vocational degrees or the professional schools we know as Masters degrees. While not all people can have the time or afford to get into them, being adjudged a certified MBA degree holder logically holds a brighter future for anyone. Or does it?</p>
<p>For one, the <a href="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/">philosophical hypothesis</a> that most MBA graduates hold are often for the better in any business perspective. Advanced education often holds that people with MBA degrees are seasoned and adequately trained to handle real life issues in the world of business and management. But while that is something expected today, it seems that the surplus of MBA degree holders has been somewhat overflowing, making it a standoff as far as choosing the right person with the right degree to handle a business that wants to follow a certain route. </p>
<p>Especially now that most companies are experiencing a lot of turbulence in the business world, one cannot help but think if MBA degree holders still have a bearing in business entities. Are they a need at this point?</p>
<p>From the way things are going, it seems business can function without them. It is either that or companies are just trying to preserve their salary caps since MBA degree holders will be asking for the stars.</p>
<p>With that in mind, does the MBA philosophy make any sense? Why take up advanced professional studies if they are no longer recognized in the field of business? Maybe for entrepreneurs it is a requirement but as far as career is concerned, a lot of questions on why they should take an MBA degree is in the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/internet-philosophy/does_higher_education_make_any_difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Philosophy: The Copyleft</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/software_philosophy_the_copyleft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/software_philosophy_the_copyleft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/software_philosophy_the_copyleft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know about copyright and the laws governing them but do you know about the copyleft? According to the GNU website, “Copyleft is a general method for making a program or other work free, and requiring all modified and extended versions of the program to be free as well.” The main difference of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/copyleft-300x260.jpg" alt="copyleft" title="copyleft" width="300" height="260" align="right" />We all know about copyright and the laws governing them but do you know about the copyleft?</p>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/">GNU website</a>, <em>“Copyleft is a general method for making a program or other work free, and requiring all modified and extended versions of the program to be free as well.”</em> The main difference of a product/program that is is “copyleft” from one that is simply not copyrighted or made available to anyone freely is that it ensures that all other programs and products arising from the original one remains free as well because <em>“Copyleft says that anyone who redistributes the software, with or without changes, must pass along the freedom to further copy and change it.”</em></p>
<p>Now with such a nice spirit of sharing why isn&#8217;t everyone adopting this new way of thinking and “copylefting” their works? The answer isn&#8217;t always just plain economics since you can sell copylefted products thus allowing for a profit. What CANNOT be done is simply disallowing anyone else to your software in whatever way they want to.  However, you have to acknowledge that the “copyleft” makes for minimal profit since the creator&#8217;s “power to control” his creation is limited to simply saying that others need to also share. No more decades of getting royalty from outdated but important works that were the basis of other works. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that what many people don&#8217;t realize is that there are other ways out there to “copyright” [or not] your works. In this digital age knowing how to  protect your rights/wishes or at least the rights of your users is a must if you really wish to attain your goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/software_philosophy_the_copyleft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The American War Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_american_war_philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_american_war_philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_american_war_philosophy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been many wars that the US has engaged in during the short span since the second world war. Vietnam, the liberation of Kuwait, invasion of Iraq and many more. Many of their enemies such as these terrorists whom they blame for the crashing of planes and subsequent demise of the twin towers, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="usflag.jpg" src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/usflag.thumbnail.jpg" /><img height="86" alt="blackhawk.jpg" src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/blackhawk.thumbnail.jpg" width="113" /><img height="81" alt="somalia.jpg" src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/somalia.thumbnail.jpg" width="128" /></p>
<p>There have been many wars that the US has engaged in during the short span since the second world war. Vietnam, the liberation of Kuwait, invasion of Iraq and many more. Many of their enemies such as these terrorists whom they blame for the crashing of planes and subsequent demise of the twin towers, the World Trade Center (which was already targeted once from which they same was done by the same people so you would think they would have learned) and the deaths of many. These terrorists have capitalized on one thing that has led to many defeats such as the<em><strong><a href="”http://novaonline.nvcc.edu/eli/evans/his135/Events/Somalia93/Somalia93.html”"> Black Hawk Down </a></strong></em>Incident in Somalia when they conducted a so-called flash raid to capture several key rebel leaders which ended in one of their most humiliating defeats since Vietnam, the leave no man behind policy.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This may have to do more of the moral implications and the opinions of their constituents when their fallen are left in the battlefield to be humiliated again and again by the enemy (and very much publicized by the ever present media who go where no media people have gone before capitalizing on the desecration and humiliation of dead people who should have otherwise been left alone out of respect and should be seen only by authorities and not the general public due to their graphic nature) Media has become an ever present entity on the battlefield which has given us front row seats in the bombing of the Iraqi capital in the <em><strong><a href="”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_and_awe“">“Shock and Awe Campaign”  </a></strong></em>(which also showed the first images of the smart-bombs or should we call them not-so-smart bombs that hit some unwanted targets causing some collateral damage(which could also have been the result of the Iraqi army lobbing shells at their own people making it look as if the smart-bombs missed). The morality being missed as they clamor to be the first to get there and break the news, in their never ending quest to bring the news(good or bad) straight to your TV as you are sitting down to eat dinner after a long hard day’s work The Military have had a policy of getting all their personnel out dead or alive as soon as possible to avoid a turning of tides at home where families can start complaining to the government that their son’s and daughter’s who went to war were not returned to them for a formal and decent burial which can have disastrous effects on their morale and the government’s political opponents agenda to use against it.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_american_war_philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics and the Law</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/politics_and_the_law_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/politics_and_the_law_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutes and Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/politics_and_the_law_/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are totally unrelated areas of study in philosophy yet they are somewhat similar due to their aim, the study of force. Politics is the study of how political force in relation to the general public and Legal Law is the study of how to best laws can be used to achieve social and political [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are totally unrelated areas of study in philosophy yet they are somewhat similar due to their aim, the study of force. Politics is the study of how political force in relation to the general public and Legal Law is the study of how to best laws can be used to achieve social and political aims. The two are often mixed and used in conjunction with each other because of this simple truth. Legal Philosophy determines or studies, which laws are better, and whether this one or that is better for all or that if this law should even be followed at all due to underlying circumstances that might substantiate invalidity. It tries to explain the relationship of social factors and human nature in a balanced outcome deciding that the outcome would be best for all. Political philosophy on the other hand is defined by the development of a government as it evolves into its current state. Meaning the development of the political structure of a country is highly dependent on which political system it has been based upon and how it’s people have reacted to those systems deciding which is best to apply. True to this, many governments and political figures muddle and try to erase the fine line in order to justify their acts. Those acts then elicit response from the public and the legalities of such actions are questioned further muddling the distinctions. Politics should always follow a certain limit and so does the legal system so instead of focusing on these personal political agenda that they try to substantiate by using the law. Politics and religion for example should always be separated due to a never-ending battle that would ensue. Governments are formed and maintained by the legal system and they should share a common goal which is to represent the society for which they represent in their best interests and not their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/politics_and_the_law_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Education’s role in promoting Ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/educations_role_in_promoting_ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/educations_role_in_promoting_ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/educations_role_in_promoting_ethics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Education is the key and this applies not only to the US, but for all people around the world who are only now beginning to get a taste of how good democracy and freedom is. China’s older generation is void of such concepts but the events of the past five or six years where the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="education.jpg" src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/education.thumbnail.jpg" align="right"/>Education is the key and this applies not only to the US, but for all people around the world who are only now beginning to get a taste of how good democracy and freedom is. China’s older generation is void of such concepts but the events of the past five or six years where the government has accepted more liberal ideas allowing free trade fueling it’s breakneck economic boom placing it before the laws that are widely accepted around the world. Many see China as the biggest market on the earth which has credence for they have 1.3 Billion citizens and it is just about opening up to the world of trade and products from the country is beginning to flood world markets. Here too, the rapid economic growth of the several economic regions in China has spurred unlikely problems like their habit of cutting corners in order to increase profits to the use of sub-standard materials in the manufacture of products for export abroad. Recalls of various products which have been found to contain dangerous amounts of poisonous chemicals contained within paints and other finishing products (even toothpaste that is laced with trace amounts of anti-freeze chemicals) have led to many arrests and rapid changes to the government’s governance regarding products standards. These manufacturers are simply not used to following rules and do whatever it takes to deliver finished products which have resulted in deaths and health problems mainly in children who have used such products.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>China faces many hurdles to become a more open and transparent state but being a socialist state may be one of it’s main obstacles. The government hopes to increase profits in terms of economic growth but another aspect of that society that has ruled the country which is human rights has repeatedly failed world standards. The education system of China has also been forced to adopt more open curricula such as the teaching of democracy which is a word banned from the verbal repertoire of many generations of Chinese in times past. The population might be finding it hard to adopt a more open world but this might be the only way for China to continue its growth and evolution into one of the world’s greatest economic powers. The next ten years will be the determining period if the growth in its economy will continue or the drive will simply crumble and fail into oblivion.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/educations_role_in_promoting_ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aristotle’s View of Politics and society as a whole</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/aristotles_view_of_politics_and_society_as_a_whole-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/aristotles_view_of_politics_and_society_as_a_whole-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutes and Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient philosophers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/aristotles_view_of_politics_and_society_as_a_whole-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aristotle, one of the founding fathers of modern philosophy has written many works regarding politics and his interpretation of such. In the book, Nicomachaean Ethics, Aristotle’s foundations for his political projects were based on the presumption that ethics and politics were closely related. In a sense of reverse thinking, he says that the main purpose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="aristotle_bust.jpg" src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/aristotle_bust.thumbnail.jpg" align="right"/><strong><a href="http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/a/aristotl.htm">Aristotle</a></strong>, one of the founding fathers of modern philosophy has written many works regarding politics and his interpretation of such. In the book, Nicomachaean Ethics, Aristotle’s foundations for his political projects were based on the presumption that ethics and politics were closely related. In a sense of reverse thinking, he says that the main purpose of politics is to empower or entice citizens to become honest and empower them to do or perform noble actions. This has been greatly contested by many Western civilizations of today who see politics as a sort of undertaking based on greed and self-interest which might be true no only for these areas but anywhere else in the world.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He also defines the aim of politics in the creation of a society with high regards for moral standing. Modern politics is defined as a governance which protects us from each end every body else outside the system with the use of military and policing forces. This has normal people on one side who abide by the rules set by the political leaders and all who are against the said order to be outcasts to be protected from. Much of Aristotle’s ideals are lost in the modern world of politics with very little so-called honorable constituents going into the system to truly represent society as a whole. Some even do it for mainly personal reasons making politics a bridge to personal gain. Today’s modern society sees the kind of molding as counter productive seeing it as a form of making people think out of their own accord. Much is to be learned from the fathers of modern philosophy whose ideals and studies has given rise to all current political systems though not much is left of the ethical part of the ideals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/aristotles_view_of_politics_and_society_as_a_whole-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philosophy in Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/philosophy_in_industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/philosophy_in_industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/philosophy_in_industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we have seen in the past posts, more and more philosophy students are finding work in the most unlikely places like manufacturing and design. Their analytic mind that questions every detail is proving to be invaluable in and out of the workplace further establishing their place. The move of industry and commerce to more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="industry.jpg" src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/industry.thumbnail.jpg" align="right" />As we have seen in the past posts, more and more philosophy students are finding work in the most unlikely places like manufacturing and design. Their analytic mind that questions every detail is proving to be invaluable in and out of the workplace further establishing their place. The move of industry and commerce to more philosophical approaches allows them better customer satisfaction for they look into the possible questions that are to be asked and formulate the solutions and answers into the products as they are designed minimizing the need for support and follow-up processes lowering costs. Products that speak for themselves are the best weapons of industry simplifying the support structures needed for their product base allowing development of better and more human friendly gizmo’s and gadgets. We will surely see more and more industry leaders adopting the philosophical approach to their business for unstable markets that can have the power to make or break an institution needs innovative ways to promote and make products better while lowering overhead costs considerably. The products we see today on the market are product of intensive research and developments in their functionality and lifetime which has suffered greatly in times past due to industry shaking events on the global scale that are forcing more and more business hung out to dry and close shop. Hopefully the adoption of better philosophy in their approach and outlook for the future will have an impact on their futures which applies to all scales of businesses from the smallest home based units to the biggest multi-national firms that are tackling diverse markets as they enter new market areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/philosophy_in_industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summing up Human Philosophy…. In a satirical cartoon.</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/summing_up_human_philosophy_in_a_satirical_cartoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/summing_up_human_philosophy_in_a_satirical_cartoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/summing_up_human_philosophy_in_a_satirical_cartoon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC released an article some time ago regarding the comparison between the satirical cartoon The Simpson’s by FOX Broadcasting, as a philosophical embodiment of human nature. I happened to come upon the article and the study they conducted and found it to be quite enlightening regarding the relationship between the philosophy of man and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img id="image107" align="right" alt=thesimps.JPG src="http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/thesimps.thumbnail.JPG" />The <strong><a href=”http://news.bbc.co.uk”>BBC</a></strong> released an article some time ago regarding the comparison between the satirical cartoon <strong>The Simpson’s</strong> by <strong>FOX Broadcasting</strong>, as a philosophical embodiment of human nature. I happened to come upon the article and the study they conducted and found it to be quite enlightening regarding the relationship between the philosophy of man and the said TV show.</p>
<p>Many of us can remember the said TV series with the wisecracking and always smart-alecky remaking Homer who has made history. All of the family members have gone through the necessary life’s phases, which were done in a most human representation as possible. For that, we commend the creators and writers who continue to provide us with a rather unorthodox view of life even though the characters are cartoons.</p>
<p>Cartoons have gone a long way when cartoons were mere short stories in newspapers. Today, cartoons can be found on any part of the globe that tackle all issues and subject matter. They are a way of trying to get a message out to people that a sense of humor is still the best human thing that is free and can be shared to all. Indeed, cartoons have become part of human culture so much as they have become parts of our lives. All of us have watched and seen them (whether you like to admit it or not) and they have had an impact on how we view the world. This impact can be seen in the appeal of these programs to our kids and even the not so young who still continue to watch and adore them as a daily routine making life a little less cumbersome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/summing_up_human_philosophy_in_a_satirical_cartoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World, A Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_world_a_prespective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_world_a_prespective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_world_a_prespective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All around the world, people are wondering what tomorrow may hold for them. For the little who do prosper, a million continue to suffer. This has been a trend seen by many for many years. Go to the most secluded areas on the planet and ask anybody of what they are thinking of and they’ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All around the world, people are wondering what tomorrow may hold for them. For the little who do prosper, a million continue to suffer. This has been a trend seen by many for many years. Go to the most secluded areas on the planet and ask anybody of what they are thinking of and they’ll say that tomorrow will tell me that. As the saying goes, “ Today I am pondering about yesterday, and by tomorrow I’ll be ready for today”. </p>
<p>We humans have a way of finding definition on our terms whatever experts tell us. True to this, lawyers can prove something terribly wrong to be righteously correct, politicians tell us that war is needed to keep the peace while peace does not exist within. People act as if they know what is happening and why it is happening even if they do not understand the reasons. A person acts blindly based on his own interpretation of the events around him. To some America is the culprit and to some the Communist’s are, both should be noted have played key parts in the development of the world as it is today. Capitalism and democracy might not be for everyone but it is surely longed for many. The basic right to freedom and the ability to express it is still void in many states. Many people suffer without voices and many more will suffer without anybody knowing about it. </p>
<p>Turn on the Television, radio and read the newspaper and we see in bold letters all the worst things that are happening around the world. What about the good things that have happened in the past 24 hours like news about the many children who have learned to read and write, what about the child who got his sight for the first time since birth? These are news that are considered not to be significant due to their lack of commercial importance, commercial importance that means people will not get anything for telling these types of headlines. Scholars argue about their beliefs over the internet claiming rights to works they publish on blogs, Author’s publishing works and claiming royalty and crying piracy and a violations of their intellectual rights. Hello people, isn’t that what the so-called .NET was supposed to be for. The .NET framework is a social network which means everybody has the right to say whatever they may choose to and use material they get to aid in their study or in their aims to get a better understanding of the world around them. Want intellectual right’s protection, publish your work in print and not online. Social networks are there to promote the ideals of freedom to do and say whatever you may wish. The stand of many people are contradictory, they move to the net (on the social network) as a way to reach more people but want their work to be exclusive which is at the same time against the basic principle of a social network, which is which.</p>
<p>Make up your mind people for the world is truly opening up and you need to stand up for something or nothing at all.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/the_world_a_prespective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extremism a departure from Society – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/extremism_a_departure_from_society_part_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/extremism_a_departure_from_society_part_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/extremism_a_departure_from_society_part_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The victims of extremism ate many and widespread; orphans, widows and many more who have lost loved ones as a result of their beliefs and actions. The IRA of Britain has claimed many a lives in their quest for independence from British rule in a bid to proclaim themselves a legitimate governing body to administer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The victims of extremism ate many and widespread; orphans, widows and many more who have lost loved ones as a result of their beliefs and actions. The <strong>IRA</strong> of Britain has claimed many a lives in their quest for independence from British rule in a bid to proclaim themselves a legitimate governing body to administer their own people. The <strong>Islamic fundamentalists</strong> who are now center stage in world politics for their bold and daring attacks on people killing themselves and others of their own faith considering them as collateral damage and as acceptable casualties. They have repeatedly attacked governments in Algeria, Iraq, and elsewhere in the world just to prove their point. The influence they have on their people is so great that they have convinced them to take their own lives for the sake of belief and the promise that their sacrifice is for the common good.</p>
<p>Since time immemorial, there are people who have fought to maintain their sovereignty from conquering parties may they be people or governments that they have twisted and turned the definitions of their religion into one that is solely directed to killing and many other atrocities. A quick glance at news <strong>headlines</strong> from around the world would give you an idea of how great the problem is and that there may be no easy solution to such incidents. Many have demands that are considered unacceptable, or simply impossible that they go on a never ending cycle of killing and maiming innocent people. One of the most recognized extremist <strong>Adolf Hitler</strong>, used the political might of German society as a way of expressing his view of a world ruled and owned by the <strong>Aryan Race</strong>. This has resulted in the death’s of millions of people not only Jews as they waged their war against other not belonging to their race that it sparked the second world war.</p>
<p>Many such groups and political arms have and are still in the ranks of society that they are considered threats to not only to national security by many countries, but to world wide security as well. Fear of a new Nuclear Holocaust looms in the air as many of the world’s nuclear arsenal go missing as Soviet Russia fell and many of it’s former member cities declaring their sovereignty from the main Socialist republic founded by <strong>Joseph Stain</strong>. The threat of a so-called contaminating bombs that do not aim to result in a huge nuclear blast but to rather spread nuclear material causing massive deaths due complications of exposure to radiation from the material dispersed by the said device. This has been on the priority of governments around the world that was heightened by the attacks on America of the infamous 9/11 when many died as a result of extremist activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.definitionofphilosophy.com/general/extremism_a_departure_from_society_part_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

